A seminar series on current issues related to democracy.
The launch of this series consisted of the SNS Democracy Report 2017: Cooperation and Conflict in a Parliamentary Democracy, presented in September 2017, one year before the 2018 Swedish elections. This initiative was linked to the long history of SNS engaging in well-publicized research on democracy and the political system.
Democracy Council Report 2021: Polarization in Sweden was published in the spring of 2021. This council, chaired by Henrik Ekengren Oskarsson, professor of political science, University of Gothenburg, studied the extent of ideological polarization in Sweden.
During the period 1995–2011, the SNS Democracy Council published annual reports. For information on these reports as well as other books and reports on democracy and the political system, click here.
The SNS Democracy Report 2017 and the seminar series have received financial support from the Hans and Märit Rausing Charitable Trust, Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation), the Swedish Research Council and Bonnier Holding.
Contact: Nina Bruce, project manager, email@example.com
Raoul Grünthal, outgoing CEO of Schibsted Sweden, journalist Emanuel Karlsten as well as media scholars Annika Bergström and Peter M. Dahlgren discussed political polarization in relation to established and alternative media. Watch the seminar. June 28, 2021
Johannes Lindvall, professor of political science at Lund University, presented his research on what is required to carry out major political reforms. Comments from Per T. Ohlsson, journalist and writer, Eva Uddén Sonnegard, PhD in economics and former state secretary (Moderates), and Bengt Westerberg, former minister of social affairs and leader of the Liberal Party. The discussion was chaired by Cecilia Garme, journalist with a PhD in political science. Watch the seminar. May 6, 2021
Polarization has in recent years become a term commonly used in a variety of contexts. But what does polarization refer to and has the level of political polarization increased in Sweden? This has been studied by professor Henrik Ekengren Oscarsson together with three colleagues in the “Democracy Council Report 2021: Polarization in Sweden.”. Comments from party secretaries Lena Rådström Baastad (Social Democrats) and Gunnar Strömmer (Moderates) as well as by Jan Helin, media director at SVT. Watch the seminar. March 26, 2021
It was not until 134 days after the 2018 Swedish election that Sweden had a new government consisting of the Social Democrats and the Green Party. Why was the government that had just resigned simply recreated and why did it take so long? This was discussed by Johannes Lindvall and Jan Teorell, both professors of political science, Maggie Strömberg, political reporter at Expressen, and Per Westerberg, former member of parliament (Moderates) and speaker of the parliament in 2006–2014. Watch the seminar. November 17, 2020
Two days after the US presidential election, SNS invited political scientists, historians and representatives from the business sector for a discussion. Why did things transpire the way they did? Which agenda will the newly elected president pursue? And what does this mean in terms of politics and the economy? Watch the seminar. November 5, 2020
In the wake of the coronary crisis, many countries have taken extensive measures to reduce the spread of the virus. Governments around the world have gained more power at the expense of elected parliaments while constitutional rights are under threat in many locations. During the webinar, Johannes Lindvall and Staffan I. Lindberg, both professors of political science, discussed the situation in the world at large, the risk of governments taking advantage of their increased powers only intended to be temporary even after the crisis and what we can learn from past experiences. Watch the webinar. May 19, 2020
Presentation of the report The Swedish Commissions of Inquiry 1990‒2016. In Sweden, the government typically appoints an independent commission, known as a commission of inquiry, with members coming from the government, opposition parties, academia, interest groups, and the private sector. The broad commission membership has often succeeded in negotiating compromises and incorporating different perspectives on the implications of different proposals. Recently, however, both scholars and policymakers have expressed concerns that commissions of inquiry may have changed in ways that make it harder for them to fulfill their roles.
The general public’s trust in the political system is falling. It has become more difficult to build a stable government coalition and build a majority in the parliament. One year before the election, five political scientists presented their analysis of how well the Swedish parliamentary democracy is working.
Two political scientists and two politicians discussed voting and voter behavior. What makes us go vote? What decides our party choices? And what do the parties think?