The Swedish housing market is characterised by a shortage of housing as well as increased inequality. At the same time, financial resources and social networks have become more and more important. The unequal housing supply therefore risks reinforcing unequal living conditions. A characteristic feature of the Swedish housing policy ever since 1945 is that it has been universal in nature, thus aimed at everyone and not at specific groups. Municipal housing companies (allmännyttan) have served as a cornerstone of the universal housing policy with its motto “good housing for all”. Today, however, municipal housing companies vary significantly across Sweden. In some municipalities, they operate in line with the intention of the housing policy, while in others they primarily offer housing for low-income households. And in some municipalities, furthermore, there is no longer any public housing or low-income households are excluded from the municipal companies as a result of high-income requirements.
“The universal housing policy needs to be restored and updated in relation to our current society. The key here is not to subsidise the construction of new housing, but the individual”, says Martin Grander, Ph.D. and researcher at the Department of Urban Studies, Malmö University.
Martin Grander proposes the following changes in the housing policy:
- upgrade the housing allowance to enable greater precision when reaching out to the groups in need of housing
- develop the municipal and/or the regional responsibility regarding the housing supply
- introduce a model for governmental rent guarantees
- reform the allocation systems by prioritising and instituting alternatives to time in municipal queues
“By means of these necessary selective elements, the universal housing policy and the municipal housing companies may function as once intended. Building new social housing for people with very low incomes, however, would be the wrong move here. There is a large stock of affordable housing that needs to be better utilised and made available to people with great needs and limited ability to pay”, says Martin Grander.
The report analyses the development of municipal housing companies and housing supply from the 1940s up until today. The analysis is based on surveys and extensive statistical data, largely produced specifically for the report. The housing supply and municipal housing companies are studied and compared in the cities of Malmö, Norrköping, Landskrona and Gothenburg in order to identify local differences.
The report is part of SNS’s research project Sustainable Urban and Rural Planning.
More on Housing and Infrastructure
Rapid increase in land costs and building materials an explanation for high prices on housing
In a new SNS report, economists Mats Bergman and Sten Nyberg describe the rapid rise in housing prices in Sweden ever since...Economic redistribution does not solve residential segregation
Income-related residential segregation in Sweden has increased the past few decades. However, this increase is not the result of a reduced redistribution in the form of taxes and transfers. This is shown by economist Che-Yuan Liang in the SNS report “Income Inequality and Residential Segregation.” Liang finds that individuals with a low pre-tax income to a greater extent tend to reside in certain residential areas.Digital infrastructure not only resulted in increased productivity but also in increased wage differences
The expansion of broadband internet in Norway resulted in firms exhibiting increased productivity, greater wage differences between individuals with high and low levels of education, and an increase in the negative impact of distance on international trade. These are the results in one of the few studies having successfully shown the causal effects of digital infrastructure on the economy. This study is presented in the new SNS report “Economic impact of investments in digital infrastructure” by economist Anders Åkerman.
Researcher: The time has come for a new taxation of housing
Sweden needs a new and neutral taxation of housing. The current taxation is unfavourable to certain groups of households, regions and forms of housing, without being the result of articulated political priorities. This is the conclusion made by economist Peter Englund in the SNS report “A New Taxation of Housing” published today.