As a small country on the outskirts of Europe, Sweden must safeguard its competitiveness. Hence, taxes should not hamper work and economic growth. At the same time, they ought to facilitate moving toward environmental and social sustainability, according to Åsa Hansson in the SNS report “A Swedish Tax System for the 21st Century.”
“A more up-to-date tax system could address many of the problems we face in our current society,” says Åsa Hansson, associate professor of economics at Lund University.
In the report, which is part of the SNS project “Taxes in a Globalised World,” she presents several examples of possible reforms aimed at making the tax system more effective. These include lower taxation of labor at both the lower and upper ends of the income distribution, a uniform VAT at 25 percent as well as a uniform tax on capital income that also includes property tax.
In order to safeguard competitiveness, she also recommends that the corporate tax is reduced to a level that is lower than in large countries and that tax regulations are designed to encourage investments in entrepreneurship, research and development. Rather than offering detailed proposed reforms, Hansson wants to show how the process of taxation may be improved without resulting in worse public finances or a more unequal distribution of income and wealth in society.
“From an international perspective, Sweden has high taxes on labor, whereas less harmful taxes, such as taxes on property and consumption, are used to a lesser extent compared to other countries,” says Åsa Hansson.
Commissioned by SNS, the Swedish National Financial Management Authority has calculated the results of the proposals presented in the report if they were to be implemented. These results indicate higher employment, more hours worked and increased growth in the economy. According to Hansson, these calculations should be interpreted with caution, but they nevertheless offer a clear picture of what is possible. She points out how a new major tax reform could help strengthen Sweden’s economy and competitiveness while at the same time simplifying the tax system and making it more transparent.
“This is an opportunity that the people of Sweden should not miss,” says Åsa Hansson.
ABOUT THE RESEARCHER
Åsa Hansson is an associate professor of economics. After receiving her PhD in 2000, she has worked as a teacher and researcher at Lund University, the University of Copenhagen and the University of Massachusetts. She carries out research in public finances, mainly studying how taxes affect the behavior of individuals and companies. She was a member of the Swedish Fiscal Policy Council in 2018–2021 and was one of the authors of the SNS Economic Policy Council Report 2018.
about the project
“Taxes in a Globalised World” is a research project carried out for three years under the guidance of SNS and focuses on the impact of globalization and technological developments on the tax system. The eighteenth and final seminar of this project will be held at the large tax conference organized by SNS between May 31 and June 1. Here, Åsa Hansson will present her new report. She has followed “Taxes in a Globalised World” since it was launched, and her analysis is partially based on the thirteen reports previously presented within the framework of the project.
More on Public Finance
Researchers: Possible to improve public procurement by means of a supplier rating system
The legal framework of public procurement contributes to uncertainty regarding the quality of future deliveries. One way of addressing this problem is to introduce an open system for rating suppliers, according to four researchers in a new SNS report.The SNS Economic Policy Council 2022: Introduce a rating system in public procurement similar to systems used for taxi and hotel services
A major problem with regard to public procurement is that buyers are not allowed to take previous experiences with suppliers into account...Economists: the incentives given to municipalities by the national government should be reexamined
Swedish municipalities and regions have incentives to raise taxes more than what is optimal from society’s point of view, according to economists...Behavioral economist: That is why opportunity costs tend to be ignored in decisions on public spending
Intuition, unconscious rules of thumb and conscious misinterpretations influence our choices when making decisions – both personally and when it comes to using public funds – according to economist Gustav Tinghög. In the SNS report “The Psychology of Opportunity Costs – Feelings and Cost-Effectiveness in Public Sector Decisions,” he summarizes the results of behavioral experiments on decisions related to prioritizations in the health care sector.