Skip to content
Research report | 5/7/10

SNS Democracy Policy Council 2010. The Europeanisation of Sweden

5/7/10 - Sweden has now been an EU member for about 15 years. According to the SNS Democracy Policy Council, there is still too much caution and too large a tendency to take an approach to the EU-membership as if it were a marginal change or a threat to defend oneself against. In this year’s report, ”The Europeanisation of Sweden”, the researchers present a reform package that would reinforce Swedish democracy and benefit the Swedish influence in the EU.

HOW HAS SWEDEN BEEN AFFECTED BY THE EU MEMBERSHIP? The report evaluates how Swedish policy and democracy have change due to the EU membership within mainly the following four areas: the constitution, the public administration, party politics and the welfare model.

MISLEADING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. The report shows that the description of the relationship between Sweden and the EU in the constitutional law is becoming increasingly misleading and that the change that is expected to be made in the fall is not sufficient. The constitutional law provides a picture of Sweden having a larger control of the EU, its development and its consequences for the Swedish constitution than what is actually the case.

USE THE SWEDISH PARLIAMENT. Among other things, the council considers that the Swedish parliament should try to resume some of the power that it has lost in relation to the government, for example by using the new role obtained by national parliaments due to the Lisbon Treaty. The government has gained access to new political arenas, while the control function of parliament has become more difficult and its role in implementing EU regulations has been undermined due to changed legislative forms in the EU.

MORE POWER TO THE PRIME MINISTER. The requirements for EU coordination have supplied the Prime Minister and the Cabinet Office with increased power, at the expense of the ministries, in particular the Foreign Ministry. Civil servants at lower levels have also gained increased power and autonomy, due to their expert knowledge on EU issues.

LACK OF STRATEGIES. The council draws the conclusion that Sweden does currently suffer from a lack of reforms and strategies for meeting the effects of the membership on Swedish democracy and policy. This passiveness runs the risk of resulting in a self-inflicted lack of democracy in Sweden and an unused potential for influence in Brussels.

Researchers and Scientific Directors
The 2010 Democracy Council consists of JONAS TALLBERG (Chairman), Professor of Political Science at Stockholm University, NICHOLAS AYLOTT, Associate Professor and Lecturer in Political Science at Södertörn University, CARL FREDRIK BERGSTRÖM, Professor of EU Law at Uppsala University, JOAKIM PALME, Professor of Political Science at Uppsala University and Managing Director of the Institute for Future Studies and ÅSA CASULA VIFELL, PhD in Political Science and Researcher at the Department of Political Science at Stockholm University and The Institute of Contemporary History at Södertörn University.

ISBN 978-91-86203-40-5

Released May 7 2010

Categories

Research programs

Subject

More from SNS Democracy Council

  • Research report Democracy and society

    SNS Democracy Council 2023. Global governance – fit for purpose

    Transboundary problems such as climate change, military conflicts, trade barriers, and refugee flows require increased collaboration across borders. This is to a large extent possible using existing international organizations. In such a case, however, they need to be considerably strengthened – while current trends take us in the opposite direction, according to the researchers in the SNS Democracy Council 2023.
  • Research report Democracy and society

    SNS Democracy Council Report 2022: Local Democracy at a Crossroads

    It should be made clearer who actually governs municipalities, according to the SNS Democracy Council 2022, which in its report “Local Democracy at a Crossroads” proposes a series of reforms to promote accountability and the rule of law in Swedish municipalities. The council also calls for a clearer division of labor between politicians and public officials.
  • Research report Democracy and society

    SNS Democracy Council Report 2021: Polarization in Sweden

    There are few signs indicating that Sweden is experiencing a level of polarization threatening to paralyze democratic conversations or processes. The Swedish party system has always been heavily polarized, and the existing ideological polarization based on a left–right dimension is more characterized by stability than by change. This is shown by four researchers in a new report released by SNS Friday 26 March: »Democracy Council Report 2021: Polarization in Sweden.«
  • Research report Democracy and society

    SNS Democracy Report 2017. Cooperation and Conflict in a Parliamentary Democracy

    Sweden’s party system is more fragmented than ever, and new conflict lines have emerged. In recent years, government formation has become more complicated and uncertain. Meanwhile, popular confidence in Sweden’s democratic institutions has declined. Will these trends continue? In the SNS Democracy Report 2017, Cooperation and Conflict in a Parliamentary Democracy, five political scientists assess the quality and need for reform in contemporary Sweden’s parliamentary democracy.

Other research report on Democracy and society

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay updated with our latest insights, seminars and research news.